h4831sc Fundamentals Explained
h4831sc Fundamentals Explained
Blog Article
Because there doesn't look like any "official" Load Data available for this Load, can many of you offer a place to begin with this mixture and issues to consider when Doing work this Load up?
I have employed H4831 (and H4831SC), and I use it. There usually are not several cartridges which i use it for as I seem generally to gravitate to other powders. Having said that, I can not state that it would not perform. It is simply that Another powders perform improved to get a provided cartridge. As an example, within the 280, H4831 gave me very good velocity and really good groups with Nosler 140 AB. On the other hand, RL19 was marginally better in precision, although the velocity was nearly identical.
You are appropriate They can be the exact same the SC is brief Slash so it meters greater, I do not Assume you can find just frequent 4831 any more
243, and a number of the loads I have began with consist of, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am planning to shoot the IMR7828 loads very first, followed by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises when the H-4831sc loads show a shotgun sample! Who is aware, I just may well find a use for it after all.
some cartridges have a tendency copper foul a lot more than Many others nevertheless, regardless of how smooth the end is about the bore and have to have cleansing with the copper fouling h4831sc additional generally.
I've made use of H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without any variation. The one thing could be the shorter Slash gives you a little more space. Great luck!gun)
If there isn't a load data it can be because this powder isn't appropriate for this cartridge. Commonly one will never obtain one powder to suit all cartridges, along with the family members of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) you are asking about doesn't perform.
excaliber claimed: I've uncovered the precise reverse being correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and equally accurate powder in my 300 Win Mag.
While using the smoother flow qualities will come far more uniform cost weights, while the person grains orient a lot more compactly, creating improved loading density.
Why would I point out this? Just what is my issue? I'm unsure that there's a true legitimate stage besides h4831sc load data what is common with most hasn't been popular with me in any way in these instances. Do I just have a powder jinx or anything? In order to show you how nuts I really am, tomorrow I'm array tests a buddies new .
As for the 4831 vs 4831SC, These are a similar/identical powder cept for grain measurement. Load data is interchangeable.
It's most likely that no even more dialogue is required, by which situation we suggest beginning a new thread. If however you really feel your reaction is needed you may however do this.
arkansas or ohio i never found a variance aside from the normal is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan.
IMR4831 and H4831SC are distinct. Where by you could be bewildering it and thinking that it truly is shut is H4831 and H4831SC are incredibly h4831 vs h4831sc very similar. These two are basically the same besides H4831SC is manufactured to lesser grains so it meters simpler.